[dropcap]I[/dropcap]t seemed to be a setting of stark contrasts and contradictions that did not have much chance from the get-go of ending differently from the way it ended on Monday March 9. Emir Muhammadu Sanusi II was a well-known, well-educated and well-heeled public intellectual who carried the badge of a radical ideologue haughtily.
Brilliant, uncompromising, cosmopolitan, urbane technocrat, Sanusi was not afraid to utilise his sharp tongue in demolishing traditional values; feudal practices and any and every practice that he considered to be antithetical to development in northern Nigeria specifically; and Nigeria generally. It would have served him and society better if he had chosen to be a non-resident reformer, unaffiliated, unaligned; totally on his own, employing himself as his man and delivering his homilies from time to time to the power elite; as well as other decision makers without caring whose ox was gored.
As Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria, he exercised the powers of that office with reckless casualness; donating billions of Naira to a few universities of his partisan choice. Many people queried the fairness of his choices and the audacity of a Central Bank Governor dishing out such humongous monies; without worrying about political and financial correctness. In 2014, he wrote a letter to President Goodluck Jonathan; alleging that $49.8 billion which ought to have been in the Federation account was missing.
The letter was leaked to the public either by him or by someone else and the dam broke. First, the leakage of the letter was an issue. Then the correctness or otherwise of the figure was another. As the uproar grew into a commotion, Sanusi kept revising the figure downwards until it came to about $20 billion.
The Jonathan government got angry. Within a jiffy, the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) had produced a report that accused Sanusi of financial recklessness.
As Sanusi stepped out of the country on a duty tour; he was suspended and someone quickly appointed to act as the CBN Governor.
His office was allegedly sealed.
He returned but he did not resume in the office he occupied. He simply went home and did not get plaudits as an anti-corruption czar simply because; his critics thought he was doing the APC’s dirty job which may have contributed to Jonathan’s loss of the presidency. But he was probably just doing an anti-corruption crusader’s job as he saw it.
Then Emir Ado Bayero of Kano died. It seemed an opportune moment for Sanusi to bring to fruition his consuming passion to occupy the throne of his forefathers. Many reasonable people were puzzled by the desperate desire of this radical intellectual; with an uncompromisingly high level of outspokenness to seek the conservative seat of the Emir of an ultra-conservative territory. Governor Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso decided against the temperamentally better suited Ado Bayero to give the throne to Sanusi.
Kwankwaso had vied in the primaries of the APC wanting to be the party’s presidential flagbearer. Muhammadu Buhari defeated him. He returned to the PDP from whence he came. Dr. Abdullahi Ganduje of the APC won the Governorship election of the State. Subsequently, he inherited Sanusi as the Emir of Kano.
There was no love lost between the two men.
Some analysts think that Emir Sanusi in his utterances and behaviour was treating Governor Ganduje with undeserved condescension. When the Governor spent 30 days in China to negotiate for a loan; Emir Sanusi reportedly said that the Governor wanted to borrow money to do rail transportation for people to attend weddings in Kano. This remark did not go down well with Governor Ganduje.
During last year’s Governorship election in Kano the Governor reportedly suspected that Emir Sanusi was supporting Kwankwaso’s man; Mallam Abba Yusuf of the PDP against him. That feeling must have poisoned their relationship so deeply that Mr. Sanusi has been subjected to probes on the administration of the Emirate targeting him for possible corruption. The Governor also broke the Kano Emirate into four, thus whittling down the powers and influence of Sanusi.
However, Sanusi failed to read the writing on the wall. The emerging scenario of mutual hostility did not go unnoticed. In fact, prominent Nigerians such as former Head of State, General Abdulsalami Abubakar; Vice President Yemi Osinbajo and business tycoon Alhaji Aliko Dangote had tried to broker peace between them. Their efforts came to naught.
It is certain that Dr. Ganduje was rattled also by Sanusi’s regular lampoon of the conservative feudal system in Kano and the rest of the north; his preachment against the poor treatment of the girl-child, street begging, polygamy by the poor; as well as the north’s low interest in matters of education.
For most reasonable Nigerians, these issues are critical for the advancement of the north and Nigeria. They have actually been addressed by many other Nigerians.
In fact, radical members of the political and intellectual elite from the north; such as Balarabe Musa, Bala Usman, Aminu Kano and Bala Mohammed, to mention but a few; had at one time or another addressed these various issues as matters that ought to lead to a development paradigm shift in the north. The difference is that none of them was an Emir. Besides, their messages lacked the haughtiness and the stridency of Emir Sanusi’s message; which seemed to be an unacceptably drastic put-down that was capable of bringing disharmony to the conservative feudal north.
As an Emir, Mr. Sanusi was a public servant paid from the public purse of Kano State. He held his office at the pleasure of the Governor; who invariably deserved to be given all the respect that is due to that office. But it does appear that Dr. Ganduje did not feel that he was suitably respected by the Emir. Therefore, he decided to teach him who the boss was.
So, it was bound to be a brutal battle between royalty and radicalism. The two of them were likely to make strange bed-fellows. Sanusi was an embodiment of both; was royalty likely to trump radicalism? Or radicalism was likely to be the winner? Really, radicalism has no place in a conservative institution like the monarchy. The north has been ossified for ages by the feudal system and does not seem ready; even now, to throw it into the waste bin.
Sanusi’s radicalism lacked moderation, equanimity and a sense of balance.
Considering the overarching demand for respect, if not reverence, by political authorities in Nigeria; a man like Sanusi with chips on his shoulders and considerable intellectual swagger; was more likely than not to get into trouble with conservative bosses who were resentful of his arrogance. He ought to have known that as Emir he was not his own master; that he had a boss that needed respect from a highly respectable man like him for his boss is self-validation.
Sanusi probably thought that by virtue of his accomplishments before his ascension to the throne; (Managing Director of a bank, Governor of Central Bank); he was likely to earn the reverence of his boss as Emir. He probably also thought that he would use the rigour of his rhetorics to bamboozle his boss into accepting his political, economic and social postulations as the path to a new era in Kano State.
Nevertheless, he misjudged on two grounds. One, he did not need the Emir’s job considering his ideological credentials. Two, if he thought he needed it he ought to have lowered his profile; toned down his radical postulations and serve humbly and conservatively as the office has always demanded.
But I think he felt that he could change the Emirship institution rather than the institution changing him. He could not change the institution and the institution could not change him.
Instead, he lost.
He was dethroned and then banished to some village he had never been to in Nasarawa State. Banishment is one of the anachronistic relics of our colonial and military era. It has no place, not even a remote place, in our constitutional democracy.
Good a thing his rights as a bona fide citizen of Nigeria hitherto trampled upon have been restored by the law court. From now onwards, he will no longer be living in bondage. He is free to campaign for renaissance in the north and Nigeria without any reservation.
But he has wounds to lick.
Ray Ekpu is a veteran journalist who was one of the founders of Newswatch, the iconic weekly news magazine. This article first appeared in The Guardian.
The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author.
