NEW YORK, USA — A federal judge has vacated the upcoming trial date for New York City Mayor Eric Adams, but declined to dismiss the bribery, corruption, wire fraud, and foreign donation charges against him, leaving the case in limbo as legal and political tensions escalate.
U.S. District Judge Dale Ho ruled Friday that the April 21 trial date will be canceled, but rather than immediately dismissing the case, he appointed Paul Clement, a prominent conservative attorney and former solicitor general under President George W. Bush, to argue whether dropping the charges is in the public interest.
Judge Ho wrote in his ruling that, given the “unusual fact patterns” surrounding the case, an adversarial process is necessary to examine the Justice Department’s decision to drop the prosecution.
“Normally, courts are aided in their decision-making through our system of adversarial testing, which can be particularly helpful in cases presenting unusual fact patterns or in cases of great public importance,” Ho wrote.
DOJ’s Motion to Drop Case Sparks Internal Chaos
The Justice Department’s decision to dismiss the case against Adams has roiled federal prosecutors and led to an exodus of DOJ officials in protest.
Eight federal prosecutors—including the interim U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York—have resigned, citing opposition to the DOJ’s motion to end the prosecution of Adams.
Additionally, four deputy mayors have departed from New York City Hall in the wake of the controversy.
Acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove, a former Trump personal attorney, defended the DOJ’s decision earlier this week, arguing that prosecuting Adams would interfere with the Trump administration’s immigration policies in New York City.
“DOJ headquarters has prosecutorial discretion, and a prosecution of Adams interferes with the Trump administration’s immigration initiatives in New York City,” Bove stated.
Bove also denied allegations that a quid pro quo had taken place between the Trump administration and Adams in exchange for dropping the charges.
Adams Denies Wrongdoing Amid Political Fallout
Adams, who consented in writing to the DOJ’s motion to dismiss the charges, has strongly denied any corrupt arrangement with the Trump administration.
The mayor was charged with allegedly soliciting and accepting donations from foreign nationals in exchange for supporting Trump’s immigration policies.
The accusations, combined with Adams’ increasingly public embrace of Trump, have fueled Democratic criticism of the New York City mayor.
What’s Next?
Judge Ho has set a March 7 deadline for legal briefs on the case and may hold a March 14 hearing if necessary.
The decision to appoint Clement—a staunch conservative legal advocate known for shaping right-wing legal victories—suggests that the judge is not willing to accept the DOJ’s motion to dismiss without further legal scrutiny.
The case continues to pose significant political and legal challenges, with implications for both Trump’s influence on federal law enforcement and Adams’ political future in one of the nation’s most high-profile Democratic strongholds.